News / cycling

Council bosses were warned against scrapping cycle lane

By Alex Seabrook  Monday Jan 9, 2023

City Hall chiefs were warned by internal council advisers that plans to remove an important cycle lane would prove hugely unpopular, but pressed ahead anyway. Bosses were told removing a cycle lane along Whiteladies Road would be a “real public relations risk”.

Last summer Bristol City Council revealed its plans to remove the cycle lane which runs from the junctions at Tyndall’s Park Road to Queens Road . That stretch of the road often floods, and the plans would have seen wider pavements and new larger drains to help prevent flooding.

But these plans were scrapped after proving controversial among many cyclists, as Whiteladies Road is a main corridor into the city from the north and the cycle lane is well used. New documents show how council bosses were warned of this potential risk in 2021.

Independent journalism
is needed now More than ever
Keep our city's journalism independent. Become a supporter member today.

https://twitter.com/BristolDon/status/1610635958038274049

Internal advisers said the plans were “really not ideal” as that route is “busy and with vocal users”, according to documents released under freedom of information laws. Despite these warnings, Labour councillor for Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston Don Alexander, who is also cabinet member for transport, said he would try to “warm up” his cycling team and was “happy to remove the cycle lane”.

Writing on Twitter, Alexander said: “We spoke with more people and revised our plans accordingly. We do a lot of that.”

Transport projects to change the road network go through a quality assurance process before getting final approval.

One step is to hear comments or objections from various departments in the council, like the tree team, city design, or cycling team. A quality assurance form was filled out in 2021, with several clear warnings from council staff.

A traffic signal officer said: “Our preference would be to retain as much cycle provision as possible, only because we have just installed the first early-release traffic signals for cyclists in the city at the next junction down, at Triangle West, so it may look potentially contradictory if in the next breath we take cycling provision away here.”

The cycle lane on Whiteladies Road was set to be scrapped due to flooding risk – photo: Betty Woolerton

A cycling officer said: “I think the public pressure to install more cycle routes will increase, and removing it — especially here, which is busy and with vocal users — will be a real PR risk to the authority. We have just consulted on the A37/A4018 project, where we stated we are improving pedestrian, cycle and bus routes.

“In a location like this, I don’t think we should be taking 2 to 3.8 metres out of use, as we need all the space we can get allocated to pedestrians and cycles, as this is one of the main corridors into the city from the north. I appreciate the issues here, but I think removing the cycle route and still only providing two metres for pedestrians is really not ideal.”

A transport project manager said: “It’s a vital bit of road for prioritising cycle infrastructure in the long term,” adding that “any scheme here, where we are replacing the road surface for the long term, should have integrated protected cycling provision as far as possible, or we are really missing an opportunity”.

Later in 2021, Alexander was briefed by transport department bosses on the flood prevention scheme on Whiteladies Road. Minutes of that meeting show he was warned how the severity of the flooding meant the council was breaching its equalities and statutory duties to keep a safe footway, and taking action to prevent floods was increasingly urgent.

One officer said: “Water is flooding into properties on Whiteladies Road which cannot happen. The reality is we remove the trees or remove the cycle lane, which is not ideal but possible. Need to do something to keep safe as we have a legal duty under the Highways Act.”

Another officer advised that “the Bristol Cycle Campaign doesn’t like this type of cycle lanes, so it may not be as much of a PR risk as thought … their call is for proper segregated routes”. The minutes then state that Alexander “would have a chat with the cycling team at his meeting this afternoon, to warm them up”.

https://twitter.com/VassiliPapa/status/1525875722564382723

In May last year the council unveiled its plans to remove the cycle lane, widening the pavements, and creating soft grass verges to soak up the rain. More than 1,000 people responded to a public consultation showing the removal plans were hugely unpopular — 94 per cent of respondents objected to removing the lane.

Then in October, the removal proposals were scrapped and a new draft plan was drawn up, which saves the cycle lane. One option would see the height of the pavements raised and a stepped cycle track installed, which would include new drains to help alleviate flooding. The council previously said it was “at the early stages of exploring these options”.

Green councillor Tom Hathway, who represents Clifton Down, said: “We had been raising the issue of this stretch for a while and were told that a project was on the horizon. Despite several requests for involvement we were only able to see the proposal a couple of days before the consultation launched — where we pointed out it was going to be a huge flop.

“Since the survey closed and the public response was as predicted, we met with Don Alexander and the highways team and talked through a draft new proposal, which we’ve been constructive on and saves the cycle lane.”

Bristol City Council was asked to comment.

Main photo: Martin Booth

Read next:

Listen to the latest Bristol24/7 Behind the Headlines podcast:

Our top newsletters emailed directly to you
I want to receive (tick as many as you want):
I'm interested in (for future reference):
Marketing Permissions

Bristol24/7 will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

We will only use your information in accordance with our privacy policy, which can be viewed here - www.bristol247.com/privacy-policy/ - you can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at meg@bristol247.com. We will treat your information with respect.


We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Related articles

You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Independent journalism
is needed now More than ever
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Join the Better
Business initiative
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
* prices do not include VAT
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Enjoy delicious local
exclusive deals
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Wake up to the latest
Get the breaking news, events and culture in your inbox every morning