News / Politics

Labour leaders deny slashing funding to hobble committee system

By Adam Postans  Monday Nov 28, 2022

Opposition Bristol city councillors have accused the ruling Labour group of deliberately trying to hobble the forthcoming committee system by slashing money needed to run it.

But cabinet members refuted the claims that they are taking a “scorched earth approach”, insisting no details about the new set-up, such as costs, structure or how it would actually work, had yet been provided and that sufficient funds would be given.

The row broke out at a council meeting over proposals to cut £500,000 from the mayor’s office, which will become defunct when Marvin Rees’s second term ends in May 2024 following the referendum result earlier this year to scrap the role of elected mayor.

Independent journalism
is needed now More than ever
Keep our city's journalism independent. Become a supporter member today.

It will be replaced by decision-making committees made up of cross-party councillors with power shared among groups reflecting the authority’s political balance.

A referendum in May 2022 asked whether the mayoral model should be replaced by a committee system made up of councillors – photo: Ellie Pipe

Opposition members criticised the Labour administration at a budget scrutiny meeting on Wednesday for cutting the mayor’s office costs completely from 2024/25 but failing to include any money to support the new system.

Labour deputy mayor for finance Craig Cheney said: “This is just about clearing the current system out and a new one needing to be designed and the cost of that needing to be factored into future budgets.”

But Green councillor for Redland Martin Fodor said: “Saying you’re clearing out the costs could be reframed as saying there’s a scorched earth approach being taken to clear it all out and not leave something there.”

He said the budget papers did not show funding for the committee system when it takes over from 2024/25.

“We haven’t even been asked what’s needed for that year, we’ve only been told ‘Oh, that’s to be decided somewhere else’,” Fodor said.

“So the proposals from this administration are basically cutting away support for whatever administration will come in, and that is disturbing.”

Cheney said: “That is not a fair reflection of what’s happening.

“It’s certainly not a political clearout of the support for a committee system because of course some of us will be members of the committee system too, so it’s not in our interests to do that to ourselves or you or anyone else.

“This is about re-baselining budgets, so we need to be able to say the mayor’s office used to cost this, the committee system will cost this, next year there will be a pressure in the budget which will be the cost of the committee system.

“We’ve no idea what that will be at all, we’ve got no structures designed, we don’t know what the remuneration of committee members will be, we have no sight at all of what that cost will be.”

“There is no mischief making, there’s no politicising, this has been tough for us and for staff,” Craig said – photo: Labour Bristol

Green councillor for Lockleaze David Wilcox said the referendum showed residents wanted the council to be more democratic and transparent and that proposed cuts of nearly £1m to legal and democratic services would harm the council’s ability to webcast more meetings and other ways of being accountable.

Labour deputy mayor for children’s services, education and equalities Asher Craig replied: “Year after year you were telling us that we needed to trim our own fat in terms of mayor and democratic services – we’re in November and you still have no idea about the committee system.

“So we can’t put a finger in the air and say this is how much it’s going to cost – you’re going to tell us how much it’s going to cost because we don’t know what system you’re going to put in place, and so all we can do is cut what’s not going to be in existence from 2024/25.

“When are we going to know what kind of committee system and what price is going to be paid for that?

“There is no mischief making, there’s no politicising, this has been tough for us and for staff that we’ve had to have the conversations with about the potential for what’s happening.

“So until you make the decision, we don’t know.”

Main photo: Betty Woolerton

Read next:

Listen to the latest Bristol24/7 Behind the Headlines podcast:

Our top newsletters emailed directly to you
I want to receive (tick as many as you want):
I'm interested in (for future reference):
Marketing Permissions

Bristol24/7 will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. Please let us know all the ways you would like to hear from us:

We will only use your information in accordance with our privacy policy, which can be viewed here - www.bristol247.com/privacy-policy/ - you can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at meg@bristol247.com. We will treat your information with respect.


We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices here.

Related articles

You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Independent journalism
is needed now More than ever
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Join the Better
Business initiative
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
* prices do not include VAT
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Enjoy delicious local
exclusive deals
You've read %d articles this month
Consider becoming a member today
Wake up to the latest
Get the breaking news, events and culture in your inbox every morning